Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the stm_gdpr_compliance domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/u751277545/domains/enaarc.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the breadcrumb-navxt domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/u751277545/domains/enaarc.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
Ethereum: Has anyone proposed a human only proof of work system?

Ethereum: Has anyone proposed a human only proof of work system?

Ethereum: Has anyone suggested just a work system test?

While the world still encounters the boundaries and challenges of existing work test systems (Pow), what happens is what happens if we needed a system that is not based on effective computer processors as a graphic processing unit (GPU), special application (ASIC) or even central processing units (CPU)? In this article, we will examine whether someone has only suggested a work system test and discuss the potential and effects of this system.

Problem for current imprisonment systems

The current test of work systems, such as cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, is based on effective computer processors to solve complex mathematical equations in the digital currency it just invented. Although these solutions have proven to be effective in ensuring the integrity of Blockchain networks, they have significant limits. For example:

  • The energy consumption required to enter existing imprisonment systems is magnificent, leading to concerns of environmental sustainability and network stability.

  • The computational complexity of some algorithms makes them difficult or impossible to solve even the most effective machines, including GPU and ASIC.

  • The high energy costs associated with mining lane were led by many users to choose alternative and less high intensity energy solutions.

Test only the person in the work systems: conceptual proposal

In 2015, the document appointed “terminating a work certificate as we know,” suggested an alternative test of the work system, which is not based on strong IT processors. The concept is based on the idea of ​​using machines for people only to solve complex mathematical problems.

Suggested System

The proposed system, called “Only a person only” (HPOW), uses a specialized computer network that performs a personal hardware platform designed specifically to solve mathematical problems. These computers are supposed to perform a certain algorithm that requires minimum calculation resources compared to current POW systems.

In HPOW, the following components should be:

  • Only computer : specialized machines that can perform only complex algorithms.

  • Personal hardware platform : A personal hardware platform designed to solve mathematical problems, with specialized components such as memory, processing and cooling systems.

3

Benefits of HPOW

Implementing the only human work system test could provide a number of benefits:

* Reducing energy consumption : The use of specialized hardware for problem solving, energy consumption is significantly reduced.

* Increased safety : The use of specialized computers and customized hardware platforms could improve system safety by reducing the risk of hacking or other forms of exploitation.

* Improved performance : Only human computers could be able to solve complex mathematical problems much faster than current power systems.

Challenges and Restrictions

While HPOW is a fascinating concept, there are several challenges and restrictions that need to be addressed before it can become a practical solution:

* Scalable : A personal equipment platform would require significant investment in research and development.

* Costs : Just implementing a work system test can be unreasonably expensive for many users.

* Accessibility : The specialized computers needed for HPOW may not be available to everyone, limiting its deployment.

conclusion

Ethereum: Has anyone suggested a test on a single human work system?